Self Knowing

Knowledge is conceivable just when there is genuine opportunity from oneself, from the "me", that is, the point at which the brain is never again the focal point of the interest for the "more", never again got up to speed in the longing for more noteworthy, more extensive, increasingly sweeping experience. Knowledge is opportunity from the weight of time, in light of the fact that the "more" suggests time, and as long as the psyche is the focal point of the interest for the "more", it is the aftereffect of time. So the development of the "more" isn't insight. The comprehension of this entire procedure is self-information. At the point when one realizes oneself as one seems to be, without an amassing focus, out of that self-knowing comes the knowledge which can meet life; and that insight is imaginative.

Self-information implies going profoundly into oneself without accepting anything.

On the off chance that we can unassumingly and just observe the ramifications of this, know, without accepting anything, of how our brains work and what our reasoning depends on, at that point I figure we will understand the unprecedented inconsistency that exists right now of distinguishing proof. All things considered, it is on the grounds that I feel unfilled, forlorn, hopeless, that I distinguish myself with my nation, and this ID gives me a feeling of prosperity, a sentiment of intensity. Or on the other hand for a similar explanation I distinguish myself with a legend or with a holy person. Yet, on the off chance that I can go into this procedure of recognizable proof profoundly, I will see that the entire development of my reasoning and my movement, anyway respectable, is basically founded on the duration of myself in some structure. 

LIKE HERE